Explaining the length of party manifestos in gubernatorial elections in Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54887/27376192.86Keywords:
Ecuador, Party manifestos, Gubernatorial elections, Length, CandidatesAbstract
Party manifestos have been widely analysed in political science, with a particular focus on their content rather than on their format. This article focuses on one specific aspect of the format of party manifestos as it attempts to understand the variation of their length by digging into the Ecuadorian case. Using empirical data on the content of party manifestos drafted by candidates for the gubernatorial elections (2009-2023), this article concludes that time and party size matters when one wants to understand the production of party manifestos. Party manifestos drafted in more recent years tend to be longer while large political parties tend to produce longer manifestos. In a context where the electoral management bodies take into account party manifestos for the registration of candidates worldwide, the identification of the determinants their length proved to be increasingly relevant.
Downloads
References
Aarts Kees, MacDonald Stuart Elaine, Rabonowitz George, “Issues and Party Competition in the Netherlands”, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 32, n° 1, 1999, pp. 63-99.
Agasoster Bodil, “A framework for analysing local party policy emphases in Scotland”, in Laver Michael (Ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors, Routledge, Oxford & New York, 2001, pp. 76-89.
Alonso Sáenz de Oger Sonia, Gómez Fortes Braulio, “Partidos nacionales en elecciones regionales: coherencia territorial o programas a la carta?”, paper presented at the Congress of the Asociación Española de Ciencia Politica y de la Administración, Malaga, 2325 September 2009, 38 p.
Alonso, S.; Volkens, A.; Cabeza, L. & Gómez, B. (2012). “The Content Analysis of Multi-level Manifestos. Exemplified for Spanish Regional Manifestos” WZB Discussion Paper SP IV 2012-201. Berlin: Social Science Research Center Berlin.
Bara Judith, “Israel: 1949-1981” in Budge Ian, Robertson David, Hearl Derek (eds.), Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-war Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 111-133.
Benoit Kenneth, Laver Michael, Mikhaylov Slava, “Treating Words as Data with Error: Estimating Uncertainty in the Comparative Manifesto Project Measures”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 30 August – 2 September 2007, 43 p.
Benoit, Kenneth, Michael Laver and Slava Mikhaylov. 2009. Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions." American Journal of Political Science 53(2):495-513.
Budge Ian, Farlie Dennis, Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies, George Allen & Unwi, London, 1983.
Budge Ian, “The internal analysis of election programmes”, in Budge Ian, Robertson David, Hearl Derek (eds.), Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Elections Programmes in 19 Democracies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987, pp. 15-38.
Caul Miki L., Gray Mark M., “From Platform Declarations to Policy Outcomes. Changing Party Profiles and Partisan Influence Over Policy”, in Dalton Russell J., Wattenberg Martin P. (eds.), Parties without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 208-237.
Dandoy Régis, Explaining Manifesto Length: Empirical Evidence from Belgium (1977-2007), Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshop, St Gallen, Switzerland, 12-17 April 2011, 21 p.
Dandoy Régis (2014). El desempeño electoral de los partidos politicos provinciales en las elecciones seccionales 2014 en Ecuador, Democracias, 2014, vol. 2, pp. 3-19.
Dandoy Régis (2019). Party strategies and performances in the 2019 provincial elections in Ecuador, Democracias, vol. 7, pp. 133-153.
Daubler Thomas, “When Do Parties Have Clear Programmes?”, paper prepared for the 5th ECPR General Conference in Potsdam, Germany, 10-12 September 2009, 38 p.
Dolezal Martin, Ennser-Jedenastik Laurenz, Müller Wolfgang C., Winkler Anna Katharina, “The Life Cycle of Party Manifestos: The Austrian Case”, West European Politics, vol. 35, n° 4, 2012, pp. 869-895.
Duncan Fraser, Van Hecke Steven, “Immigration and the transnational European centre-right: a common programmatic response?”, Journal of European Public Policy, vol.15, n° 3, 2008, pp. 432-452.
Gabel Matthew J., Huber John D., “Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data”, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 44, n° 1, January 2000, pp. 91-103.
Gabel Matthew, Hix Simon, “Defining the EU Political Space: An Empirical Study of the European Elections Manifestos, 1979-1999”, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 35, n° 8, 2002, pp. 934-964.
Garry, John and Lucy E. Mansergh. 1999. Irish party manifestos. In How Ireland voted 1997, ed. Michael Marsh and Paul Mitchell. Boulder: Westview pp. 82-106.
Green-Pedersen Christoffer, Mortensen Peter, “Issue Competition and Election Campaigns: Avoidance and Engagement”, paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Potsdam, September 2009, 35 p.
Hans Silke, Hönnige Christoph, “Noughts and Crosses. Challenges in Generating Political Positions from CMP-Data”, Society for Political Methodology Working Paper, 2008, 40p.
Harmel Robert, Somer Zeynep, Smith Jason, “Effects of “Europe” on National Party Issue Profiles: Assessment and Explanation of Convergence within Party Families”, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA, Feb 28, 2007, 34 p.
Janda Kenneth, Harmel Robert, Edens Christine, Goff Patricia, “Changes in Party Identity. Evidence from Party Manifestos”, Party Politics, 1995, vol. 1, n° 2, pp.171-196
Klingemann Hans-Dieter, Hofferbert Richard I., Budge Ian, Keman Hans, Petry Francois, Bergman Torbjorn, Strom Kaare, Parties, Policies, and Democracy, Boulder, Westview Press, 1994.
Klingemann Hans-Dieter, “Election programmes in West Germany, 1949-1980: Explorations in the nature of political controversy”, in Budge Ian, Robertson David, Hearl Derek (eds.), Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-war Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 294-323.
Klingemann Hans-Dieter, Volkens Andrea, Bara Judith, Budge Ian, Mc Donald Micheal, Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Eelectors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990-2003, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006.
Kritzinger Sylvia, McElroy Gail, “Meaningful Choices? Voter perceptions of party positions in European elections”, paper presented at the PIREDEU conference, Brussels, 18-19 November 2010, 33 p.
Krouwel André, van Elfrinkhof Annemarie, “From Text to Position: New Ways of Party Positioning on Political Issues and Dimensions”, paper presented at the Dutch-Flemish Politicologenetmaal, Nijmegen, 28-29 May 2009, 27 p.
Laver, Michael, Kenneth Benoit and John Garry. 2003. Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data." American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311-331.
Louwerse Tom, “The promise of political parties: congruence between electoral and parliamentary spaces of party competition in the Netherlands”, paper presented at the Dutch-Flemish Politicologenetmaal, Nijmegen, 28-29 May 2009, 27 p.
Mair Peter, “Ireland, 1948-1981: Issues, parties, strategies”, in Budge Ian, Robertson David, Hearl Derek (eds.), Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-war Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 134-159.
Mansergh Lucy, Thomson Robert, “Election Pledges, Party Competition, and Policymaking”, Comparative Politics, vol. 39, n° 3, April 2007, pp. 311-329.
Marks Gary, Hooghe Liesbet, Steenbergen Marco R., Bakker Ryan, “Crossvalidating data on party positioning on European integration”, Electoral Studies, vol. 26, 2007, pp. 23-38
Meguid Bonnie M., “Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success”, American Political Science Review, vol. 99, n° 3, August 2005, pp. 347-359.
McCluskey Nathan P., A Policy of Honesty: Election Manifesto Pledge Fulfilment in New-Zealand, 1972-2005, PhD Thesis, 2008.
Morkevicius Vaidas, “Limits of Quantitative Content Analysis in Small-N Situations: Problems of Measurement in Estimating Policy Positions from Party Documents”, paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Marburg, 18-21 September 2003.
Robertson David, “Britain, Australia, New Zealand and the United States, 1945-1981: An initial comparative analysis”, in Budge Ian, Robertson David, Hearl Derek (eds.), Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-war Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 39-72.
Slapin, Jonathan B. and Sven-Oliver Proksch. 2008. A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts." American Journal of Political Science, 52(3):705-722.
Smirnov Oleg, Fowler James H., “Policy-motivated Parties in Dynamic Political Competition”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 19, n° 1, 2007, pp. 9-31.
Tavits Margit, “Policy Positions, Issue Importance, and Party Competition in New Democracies”, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 41, n° 1, 2008, pp. 48-72.
van Heck, S. (2018). Appealing broadly or narrowing down? The impact of government experience and party organization on the scope of parties’ issue agendas. Party Politics, 24(4), 347–357.
Volkens Andrea, “Manifesto research since 1979. From reliability to validity”, in Laver Michael (Ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors, Routledge, Oxford & New York, 2001, pp. 33-49.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Democracias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
